Lone Voice, Loud Echo: Rep. Al Green Revives Trump Impeachment Fight Over Gaza Remarks
It began, as it often does in the theater of American politics, with a single voice cutting through the cavernous expanse of the nearly empty House chamber. Quiet at first, measured—but then sharpening, rising, insistent. Texas Democrat Rep. Al Green, a longtime adversary of Donald Trump, returned to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. This time, his tone was not merely resolute; it was incandescent with anger.
Green’s appearance was hardly spontaneous. He has walked this path before, repeatedly. During Trump’s first term, he introduced three separate impeachment resolutions, each largely dismissed by colleagues as symbolic gestures or performative politics. But this moment carried a different gravity.
The trigger was not January 6, nor the handling of classified documents, nor controversies over hush money. This time, it was Gaza.
Specifically, it was President Trump’s recent remarks about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict—remarks Green characterized without hesitation as an endorsement of ethnic cleansing.
“Ethnic cleansing in Gaza is not a joke,” Green declared, his voice thunderous. “Especially when it emanates from the President of the United States.”
His hands trembled slightly as he lifted the articles of impeachment he pledged to introduce in the coming days. Around him, the chamber remained largely still—no applause, no jeers—just the oppressive weight of history intersecting with the machinery of politics.
The Flashpoint: Trump’s Gaza Comments
Trump’s controversial statements came during an impromptu segment of a foreign policy roundtable just days prior. In comments that drew immediate international criticism, the former president appeared to praise Israel’s hardline tactics in Gaza, suggesting: “You have to clear it out—house by house if needed.”
He added:
“The only way to restore peace is to eliminate the chaos. And if that means removing a population that’s been radicalized against peace, so be it.”
Critics argued these remarks effectively endorsed mass displacement, potentially constituting a violation of international law if interpreted as ethnic cleansing. Standing nearby, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not object—a silence Green described as tacit complicity.
The Speech: Al Green’s Return to the Impeachment Battle
Green’s address to the House was as much an eruption as it was a legal argument.
“Still I rise, Mr. Speaker,” he began, echoing Maya Angelou’s iconic words.
“To whom it may concern: Ethnic cleansing in Gaza is not a joke… The Prime Minister of Israel should be ashamed, knowing the history of his people, to stand there and allow such things to be said.”
He went on to announce his intent to file new articles of impeachment, targeting Trump for what he labeled “dastardly deeds proposed and dastardly deeds done.”
At 76, Green is no stranger to walking a lonely path. His previous impeachment filings—one focused on Trump’s racist rhetoric, another on his handling of the Ukraine crisis—were largely viewed as political statements rather than serious legislative efforts.
Green rejects that characterization.
“I did it before. I laid the foundation for impeachment, and it was done,” he said.
“Nobody knows more about it than I, and I know it’s time to lay the foundation again.”
The Political Math: Is This Going Anywhere?
Despite the intensity of Green’s message, Democratic response was cautious, almost muted.
“It’s not a focus of our caucus,” said Rep. Peter Aguilar (D-Calif.), chair of the House Democratic Caucus.
Behind closed doors, many Democrats worry that another impeachment push—especially one centered on foreign policy rhetoric—could backfire politically.
“He’s giving Trump a campaign commercial,” a senior Democrat told Politico, speaking on condition of anonymity. “We’re in an election cycle. We’re trying to win swing districts. This doesn’t help.”
Strategists privately caution that Gaza, while important, is a deeply polarizing topic, particularly amid heightened tensions among young progressive voters, Jewish-American communities, and Arab-American constituencies.
The Articles of Impeachment: What’s In Them?
Though Green has not yet formally submitted the resolution, early drafts reviewed by multiple outlets include three major charges:
-
Abuse of Presidential Speech and Platform – Alleging that Trump used his office to endorse or incite actions that could be construed as crimes against humanity.
-
Violation of International Norms and U.S. Foreign Policy Precedent – For departing from longstanding U.S. commitments to civilian protection in conflict zones.
-
Moral Unfitness for Office – A broad clause echoing Green’s previous filings, invoking ethical violations.
Legal precedent for these charges is unclear. For Green, however, the argument is less legal than moral.
“On some issues, it is better to stand alone than not stand at all,” he concluded.
“On this issue, I stand alone. But I stand for justice.”
Meanwhile: Trump’s Threats Toward Iran Stir Fresh Outrage
Hours before Green’s speech, Trump made another set of controversial statements—this time targeting Iran. While signing an executive order reinstating sanctions and imposing “maximum pressure” on Tehran, he warned:
“If [Iran] did that, they would be obliterated… There won’t be anything left.”
He was referring to a foiled Iranian assassination plot from the previous fall, involving an Iranian national allegedly targeting Trump on U.S. soil.
Though the Department of Justice confirmed elements of the plot, critics said Trump’s language—evocative of George W. Bush-era rhetoric—risked destabilizing the Middle East. Republican allies, however, defended it as necessary.
The Targeted Plot: What We Know
Authorities say Farhad Shakeri, 51, an Iranian national, was allegedly instructed by an IRGC officer to surveil and attempt to assassinate Trump. Shakeri reportedly entered the U.S. as a child, later faced deportation after a conviction, and is now believed to be in Iran, unapprehended. Trump cited the plot to justify expanded military authority should Tehran act.
What’s Next: Is Impeachment Even Possible?
Technically, any member of Congress can introduce articles of impeachment. But the resolution must be reviewed by the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), one of Trump’s staunchest allies.
The practical reality: It will not advance under the current Republican-led House. Even if it reached the floor, it would almost certainly fail along party lines.
For Green, that’s irrelevant.
“The people have to demand it,” he said.
“And when the people demand it, it will be done.”
The Moment That Might Still Matter
In the digital age, where clips spread faster than votes, Green’s speech has already circulated widely, especially among progressive activists and international human rights advocates.
Within hours, hashtags such as #ImpeachTrumpAgain and #GazaJustice were trending. Whether this online energy will translate into tangible political momentum remains uncertain.
For now, one man, a microphone, and a chamber largely silent have reignited a debate that refuses to fade quietly into the night.
The story originally appeared on [Link].